Are blackboards more environmentally friendly than whiteboards?

by Pam Allan

blackWhiteboards

From slate.com’s Green Lantern
By Nina Shen Rastogi
Posted Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2009

“Over the summer, the high school where I teach had a complete makeover—which included replacing all our old chalkboards with whiteboards. I’m happy not to be breathing in any more chalk dust, but with all those plastic pens I’ll be throwing away, is the new system really any better for the environment than the old?”

Read the Green Lantern’s answer. Think. Respond.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

3 Responses to “Are blackboards more environmentally friendly than whiteboards?”

  1. John Pandelaki says:

    A little Google-ing goes a long way. Result:
    1. Chalk dust is a health hazard and, of all things, fire hazard! Lots of other cons. Read them here: http://www.wisegeek.com/is-chalk-dust-harmful.htm
    2. Whiteboard has its share of cons but there’s a product that can eliminate the cons, check it here: http://www.ecosmartworld.com/

    There you go.

  2. Jon says:

    Scraping a piece of chalk always instilled a feeling of deep connection with pre-French paleolithic cave artists. I only regret that I was never able to think of a reason to draw bison or a big woolly mammoth. Whiteboards can’t match that visceral connection to the past. But using them, I sneeze less.

  3. Alison says:

    Chalk boards give me the willies.