Archive for the ‘Read. Think. Respond.’ Category

Do you want to be a professor when you grow up?

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010
January 18, 2010 – New York Times

Professor Is a Label That Leans to the Left

The overwhelmingly liberal tilt of university professors has been explained by everything from outright bias to higher I.Q. scores. Now new research suggests that critics may have been asking the wrong question. Instead of looking at why most professors are liberal, they should ask why so many liberals — and so few conservatives — want to be professors.

A pair of sociologists think they may have an answer: typecasting. Conjure up the classic image of a humanities or social sciences professor, the fields where the imbalance is greatest: tweed jacket, pipe, nerdy, longwinded, secular — and liberal. Even though that may be an outdated stereotype, it influences younger people’s ideas about what they want to be when they grow up.

Continue reading. Click here.

Multiple Screens Built for Textbooks as E-Books – NYTimes.com

Monday, December 7th, 2009

articleInline-v2Thanks to Margaret van Baaren for sending this article to us.

December 6, 2009

Devices to Take Textbooks Beyond Text

By ANNE EISENBERG

NEWSPAPERS and novels are moving briskly from paper to pixels, but textbooks have yet to find the perfect electronic home. They are readable on laptops and smartphones, but the displays can be eye-taxing. Even dedicated e-readers with their crisp printlike displays can’t handle textbook staples like color illustrations or the videos and Web-linked supplements publishers increasingly supply.

Now there is a new approach that may adapt well to textbook pages: two-screen e-book readers with a traditional e-paper display on one screen and a liquid-crystal display on the other to render graphics like science animations in color.

Read the full article here.

Future of Libraries? Read. Think. Respond.

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

new_york_library01253What is a library? What makes a library? What should a library be in the future?

As a library director, and someone who has worked in libraries for over 20 years, I have some opinions.  But what do you, dear reader, think about the topic?

In the most recent USA Today article about his decision to de-book (print on paper) the library, Cushing’s head Jim Tracey says:  It was really to save libraries five, 10, 15 years down the road,” he says. “What the students are telling us is: ‘We’re not using the print books. You can keep giving them to us, but they’re just going to collect dust.’ So we’re saying, ‘Let’s be honest: Let’s give them the best electronic information available.’    To read the entire article click here.

Read, think and respond to the queries opening this blog post.

                                                             – Alison Ernst, Library Director

image: http://www.photoeverywhere.co.uk

End of Email? Read, Think, Respond!

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

imagesFrom the Wall Street Journal Online:

Why Email No Longer Rules… And what that means for the way we communicate.

“Email has had a good run as the king of communications. But it’s reign is over.”  To read the article, click here.

Well, what do you think? How are your communication patterns developing? Is the article an target or way off?

                                                             – Alison Ernst, Library Director

Childhood Favorites With Staying Power

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

I recently read a Twitter post in which Neil Gaimen (the Newbery award-wining author of  The Graveyard Book, Coraline, and the graphic novel Sandman Series) mentioned he likes to reread The Chronicles of Narnia when he has the flu, all the way through The Last Battle.  I too like to reread this childhood favorite when I’m ill. Other books I reread every now and then, just because.  Charlotte’s Web and Harriet the Spy  fall into this category.  And then there are picture books I revisit, because of their art, or what they bring back to me emotionally.    One Morning in Maine, Katy and the Big Snow, The Story About Ping…These books are physical and visual  entities, as well as good stories, that were important to me decades ago when I was an early reader. 

ping                 maine katy

 

What are the childhood books you return to again and again, and why?

                                                                            – Alison Ernst, Library Director

Digital Distractions

Monday, September 28th, 2009
distractionstoppers-header

Hilarious image by Asher Sarlin, via LifeHacker.com

From Information is Beautiful
Sept.8, 2009

The Hierarchy of Digital Distractions

I notice these days that I can spend hours at my computer, in a cloud. A swampy blur of digital activity, smeared across various activities and media and software.

Emailing, writing, tweeting, designing, browsing, taking calls, Skyping, Facebooking, RSS Feeding – all blurred into a single technological trance.

I seem to switch randomly from one to the other. But actually is there a subtle hierarchy in this cloud? Do I prefer some distractions over others? I think so.

Continue reading the article here /Read – Think – Respond

Sometimes, 140 characters isn’t nearly enough.

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

Twitter Writ Larger: Woofer

By Mike Musgrove

The Washington Post, Sunday, September 6, 2009

Sometimes, 140 characters isn’t nearly enough.

That’s the premise behind a droll Web site recently launched by a couple of Washington-based friends. While the microblogging site Twitter caps entries at 140 keystrokes, the parody site Woofer requires entries a minimum of 1,400 keystrokes. It’s a macroblogging site, you see.

 

Continue reading the article here.

What to Do About Shadow Lake?

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

Shadow Lake c 1890

The rope pull is synonymous with Shadow Lake, so this week, instead of recalling rope pulls past, it’s worth considering the condition of the local mere.  At left is our earliest view of what was once known as “The Laundry Pond,” taken before the class of 1891 built the dam which raised the water level by several feet and created the pond which we all know and love. This image was shot from in front of the original school laundry, on the far side of the lake, looking towards campus. Today’s lake is beginning to look like the lake in this view, albeit for a very different reason: plant life and silt are raising the level of the floor of Shadow Lake. Shadow Lake c 1915From the creation of the dam, through the mid-20th century, the lake assumed the borders you see in this view from about 1915, though notably, in 1928, crews of student workers spent a weekend cleaning debris from the lake bed and marge. From that date until the mid-1960s, the lake was left to its own devices, and it slowly began Shadow Lake Dredging 1965 01to choke on natural siltration and burgeoning aquatic plant life. To save the lake, the dam was opened, and it was drained in the spring of 1965. Through much of the summer the lake bed was allowed to dry, and in August, dredging began. This view, taken on August 30, 1965, shows this was no small project.

Shadow Lake Rope Pull fall 1965

Shadow Lake Rope Pull fall 1966These stark views of the rope pull from the fall of 1965 and the fall of 1966 (above at left and right) show the empty lake, and the time it took to refill during the next year or so.

Shadow Lake 2009For decades after this, the lake closely resembled the body of water shown in the 1915 image, above. But more than forty years have passed since that dredging project was undertaken, and, the present state of Shadow Lake, shown in this 2009 photograph by Craig Hefner, contrasts dramatically with that early view. Without intervention, the lake will slowly, but surely, disappear. The question now is, What should we do about Shadow Lake? Do we allow nature simply to run its course, or should we drain the lake and dredge again, or should we seek some less invasive but still effective means of recovering the beauty of the lake in our midst? Is there a viable middle course? What do you think we should do?

Are blackboards more environmentally friendly than whiteboards?

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

blackWhiteboards

From slate.com’s Green Lantern
By Nina Shen Rastogi
Posted Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2009

“Over the summer, the high school where I teach had a complete makeover—which included replacing all our old chalkboards with whiteboards. I’m happy not to be breathing in any more chalk dust, but with all those plastic pens I’ll be throwing away, is the new system really any better for the environment than the old?”

Read the Green Lantern’s answer. Think. Respond.

Cushing Academy embraces a digital future

Monday, September 7th, 2009
539wBy David Abel, Globe Staff  |  September 4, 2009

ASHBURNHAM – There are rolling hills and ivy-covered brick buildings. There are small classrooms, high-tech labs, and well-manicured fields. There’s even a clock tower with a massive bell that rings for special events.

Cushing Academy has all the hallmarks of a New England prep school, with one exception.

This year, after having amassed a collection of more than 20,000 books, officials at the pristine campus about 90 minutes west of Boston have decided the 144-year-old school no longer needs a traditional library. The academy’s administrators have decided to discard all their books and have given away half of what stocked their sprawling stacks – the classics, novels, poetry, biographies, tomes on every subject from the humanities to the sciences. The future, they believe, is digital.

“When I look at books, I see an outdated technology, like scrolls before books,’’ said James Tracy, headmaster of Cushing and chief promoter of the bookless campus. “This isn’t ‘Fahrenheit 451’ [the 1953 Ray Bradbury novel in which books are banned]. We’re not discouraging students from reading. We see this as a natural way to shape emerging trends and optimize technology.’’

(Keep reading. Click! )